by Joe
5-Minute read
Most people have known for 4 years now that there were a lot of red flags when it came to the official narrative on January 6th. We saw the videos of Antifa members changing in the bushes into Trump gear while laughing and talking. We saw BLM/Antifa activist John Sullivan lead Trump supporters into the Capitol Building while cheering himself on that he was able to do so. We saw the media twist Trump's own words to suit the narrative. We watched as prosecutors picked up people and stripped them of their basic constitutional
Senior FBI officials considered pushing back against a Justice Department directive to disclose the names of personnel involved in Capitol riot investigations but ultimately concluded they had no choice but to comply, as the order was deemed legally binding, according to current and former FBI sources who spoke with NBC News.
Initially, there was discussion about limiting the disclosure to only the names of managers and senior executives. However, the FBI’s general counsel office determined that the Justice Department’s demand for the names of all personnel involved was lawful, leaving the bureau with no room to refuse, unlike the arrests of many of the people who were there on January 6th.
This decision unfolded amid growing tensions within the FBI community. The FBI Agents Association, which represents active agents, joined former FBI Director William Webster in sending a strongly worded letter to Congressional leaders. The letter criticized the recent removal of eight high-ranking FBI officials, calling the actions opaque and lacking due process.
“These moves are causing dangerous disruptions,” the letter stated, “jeopardizing active investigations and eroding the FBI’s ability to collaborate with state, local, and international partners to ensure national security.”
Meanwhile, the Society of Retired Special Agents, an organization representing former FBI agents, mobilized its members to contact their elected representatives and voice opposition to the potential dismissal of agents working on January 6 cases. This sounds like another BS society, similar to the retired generals who claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian propaganda. It sounds like the DS is urging its shadow agents to pipe up.
“These agents were simply carrying out their assigned duties,” the group emphasized. “They risk their lives daily to protect this nation, and now the entire FBI workforce is being pulled away from their critical missions due to these unnecessary distractions.” What is it the left always points to whenever a cop shoots a non-white criminal? "I was just following orders is no excuse." Why does the same not apply here in this instance?
The situation has sparked concerns about the broader impact on the FBI’s operations and morale, as the agency navigates the fallout from the Capitol riot investigations and internal disputes over transparency and accountability.
Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats are pressing Trump Administration officials for clarity on the recent wave of firings and reassignments of senior figures within the Justice Department and the FBI, labeling the moves as a “grave risk to national security.”
In letters addressed to newly appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi and other high-ranking Trump administration officials, obtained exclusively by NBC News, Senator Richard Durbin and his Democratic colleagues are seeking detailed records regarding the personnel changes under the second Trump administration.
The senators highlighted that approximately 20 seasoned Justice Department attorneys have been reassigned or dismissed, alongside the termination of at least eight senior FBI executives. They expressed concerns over rumors of a broader purge targeting FBI agents involved in investigations related to the Capitol riot.
“While President Trump secured victory in the 2024 election,” the letter stated, “this does not grant him the power to undermine the federal civil service or to replace impartial, career professionals at the DOJ with individuals whose sole credential is allegiance to President Trump, rather than to the U.S. Constitution and its legal framework.”
According to NBC News, they had contacted all eleven Republican members of the Judiciary Committee for their views, with only Missouri’s Eric Schmitt providing a response. Schmitt stated, “The American electorate has spoken, granting President Trump a clear mandate. This election was a choice between change and the status quo of Washington,” Schmitt remarked. “President Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises by initiating much-needed reforms across various agencies, including the FBI. My advice to the Democrats is to manage their outrage wisely; they’re in for a challenging four years.”
And there you have it. End of story. All of these three letter agencies are unconstitutional to begin with. After we have watched as they abuse their power, seemingly for only one side of the political spectrum allowing themselves to be used as tools for the Democrats and RINOS to use against their political enemies... I personally believe that the FBI should be thanking Trump for allowing them to even exist any longer, I know I wouldn't.
Add comment
Comments